Exclusive: Census Nonsense

by TOM MCLAUGHLIN April 1, 2010
The 1964 Civil Rights Actprohibited discrimination on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, or national origin. Our government, however, is the biggest discriminator. It’s obsessed with race, but Americans are so used to it we hardly seem to notice anymore. When teachers get in-service training on how to administer standardized tests, I always make it a point to ask officials why we need to know what race students are and what their national origin may be. There’s always a pause, and then an answer like, “Well, umm, so we can tell how one group does compared to other groups.”
 
“Yes, but why?” I ask again. “What will you do with that information?”
 
Sometimes they get irritated at this point and I can tell that they’ve never considered the question and were not prepared to answer it, so they say something like: “We report it up the line.”
 
“If a racial differential were discovered,” I then ask, “would officials ‘up the line’ program differently to address it?”
 
“Probably.”
 
“Wouldn’t that be racial discrimination, which is supposed to have been illegal since 1964?”
 
It they hadn’t shown irritation before, they display it at this juncture and say something indignant like, “Well, it would only be to help them,” and then quickly go on to something or somebody else, hoping I’ll shut up.
 
Government always thinks it’s beneficent when it discriminates on the basis of race, or sex, or national origin because it sees itself as conferring an advantage on the downtrodden. What they almost never consider is that by advantaging one group, they’re disadvantaging another. Government officials think themselves pure-hearted and morally superior when compared to anyone else who discriminates, so they think it’s okay when they do it.
 
Girls, for example, have been advantaged so much in education the past few decades that now, according to the book Why Boys Fail, by Richard Whitmire: “Among whites, women earn 57 percent of bachelor’s degrees and 62 percent of master’s degrees. Among blacks, the figures are 66 percent and 72 percent.”
 
Discrimination is wrong no matter who does it. As Martin Luther King summed it up in his famous 1967 speech: “I have a dream that someday my children will not be judged by the color of their skin but by the content of their character.” No righteous person could argue with that, but government continues to discriminate. Consider how often you’ve been asked on a form what your race is, what your sex is, or what your religion or national origin may be. Why does government want this information? There’s a legitimate reason for asking a person’s sex because there are real differences between males and females, but race? With its Affirmative Action policies, government ignores “the content of their character” and imposes racial and sexual quotas in all its operations. That’s discrimination no matter how you slice it.
 
We’ve all seen the U.S. Census form by now. Page one starts by saying: “The census must count every person living in the United States on April 1, 2010.” As far as I know, that’s all the Constitution requires but it’s grown far beyond that. The census helps maintain the republic which, by definition is: “a state in which the supreme power rests in the body of citizens entitled to vote and is exercised by representatives chosen directly or indirectly by them.” The census enables to determine representation in a shifting population.
 
Now, however, the government wants lots of other information, especially whether we’re of “Hispanic origin.” Right after Question 7 asking for Person 1’s age and date of birth, it says: “NOTE: Please answer BOTH Question 8 about Hispanic origin and Question 9 about race. For this census, Hispanic origins are not races.”
 
Oh. So, for some other census they are? Why?
 
Question 8 asks: “Is Person 1 of Hispanic, Latino, or Spanish origin?” There’s a box for “No.” Then there are four boxes including: “Yes, Mexican, Mexican Am., Chicano”; “Yes, Puerto Rican”; “Yes, Cuban”; and “Yes, another Hispanic, Latino, or Spanish origin - Print origin, for example, Argentinian, Colombian, Nicaraguan, Salvadoran, Spaniard, and so on.”
 
There are no categories for other origins like Irish, German, Jewish, Italian. Why is it just Hispanics government wants to know about?
 
Question 9 asks: “What is person 1’s race? Mark X in one or more boxes.” Next to each box are categories including: “White”; “Black, African Am., or Negro”; “American Indian or Alaska Native”; “Asian Indian”; “Chinese”; “Filipino”; “Japanese”; “Korean”; “Vietnamese”; and “Other Asian.”
 
This is racial discrimination, pure and simple, and it’s long past time to end government obsession with it. Question 9 ends with a box next to which it says: “Some other race - print race.”
 
Please, when you fill out the census form, check that box and print HUMAN.
 
FamilySecurityMatters.orgContributing Editor Tom McLaughlin Tom is a history teacher and a regular weekly columnist for newspapers in Maine and New Hampshire. He writes about political and social issues, history, family, education and Radical Islam. E-mail him at tommclaughlin@fairpoint.net.

blog comments powered by Disqus

'Wow!' See furious father of a fallen Navy SEAL slam Obama with brutal charge

September 02, 2014  09:48 AM

Furious father gives Obama the business in epic fashion.

Whoa! Enraging: Fox News reports Obama briefed on ISIS for A YEAR. Still no strategy?

September 02, 2014  09:10 AM

Unbelievable.

Leader of al Shabab targeted by US forces overnight in Somalia. Did we get him?

September 02, 2014  08:55 AM

Mission accomplished?

'First day as NEA president': Already getting cozy with the White House [pics]

September 01, 2014  09:00 PM

"We marched, we chanted, gave speeches."

Fast food workers plan strikes, civil disobedience on Sept. 4

September 01, 2014  08:13 PM

"Whatever it takes ..."

FSM Archives

More in PUBLICATIONS ( 1 OF 25 ARTICLES )