
The U.S. government paid a Chicago consultant hundreds of thousands of dollars to put on diversity training workshops that, according to one watchdog, included an exercise in which employees were told to chant "our forefathers were illegal immigrants."
Conservative group Judicial Watch made the claim this week as it released a handful of documents pertaining to the program -- and alleged that the sessions held by the Department of Agriculture ended up enforcing political views more than promoting tolerance.
"Instead of being diversity-oriented or tolerance-oriented, it's more about adopting a mindset," said Lisette Garcia, a senior investigator with the group. "It seemed to go so far as to encourage illegal immigration."
But the USDA denied that the workshop was anything more than a training exercise to "examine stereotypes."
"Participants did not chant during these workshops," a department official said. "In one portion of the session, the presenter had participants repeat provocative and potentially offensive phrases as part of an exercise to examine stereotypes. The statements were not reflective of USDA or its policy."
Judicial Watch began to investigate the sessions earlier this year after being approached by a tipster at USDA who was "offended" by them, Garcia said. Judicial Watch claims it has identified at least $200,000 spent by the USDA over the last two years on the company Souder, Betances & Associates.
The USDA later confirmed that amount.
The tipster, Garcia said, described one session in which the speaker led workers in chanting "our forefathers were illegal immigrants" while pounding on the table and getting others in the room to join in.
"How does that fit into the USDA mission at all?" she said. "The price tag makes it more egregious."

Join FSM and stay informed. Get your daily Security Update delivered each day to your e-mail.

‘Dippin' Dots mascot?' Costumed protester humiliates herself at Va. GOP convention [photo]
May 18, 2013 10:26 AM
Out: Floppy vagina costumes. In: Birth control cosplay. Tell us that isn’t a compelling argument! She convinced me. Free birth control for all the things! RT @LaurenC_Lux Well that's happening here at the #RPV2013. http://t.co/blZtoFJ6OH— Brodigan (@brodigan) May 18, 2013 Or is she trying to tell us something else? @LaurenC_Lux dipping dots mascot?— Michael Gunn […]![]()
‘Scandals? What scandals?' Brit Hume assigns a little reading to scandalpalooza deniers
May 18, 2013 09:30 AM
Brit Hume: 1. Jay Carney: Waaahhh. Hume might not know three women named Hilary Rosen, but he does know three definitions of “scandal” that Obama defenders have conveniently forgotten. 2 : loss of or damage to reputation caused by actual or apparent violation of morality or propriety : disgrace 3 a: a circumstance or action that offends propriety or established […]![]()
May 18, 2013 08:08 AM
The Washington Post’s Greg Sargent and The Examiner’s Byron York had an interesting Twitter discussion last night about the Gang of Eight’s amnesty plan. @ByronYork fair point but I'd add that there is genuine fear that pushing it too far to right does break up coalition on left— Greg Sargent (@ThePlumLineGS) May 17, 2013 @ByronYork […]![]()
US News editor trolls conservatives over ‘real' (yet debunked) Benghazi scandal
May 17, 2013 10:34 PM
Outmatched. ![]()
Petty cash: BuzzFeed headline trumpets GOP taking IRS campaign money
May 17, 2013 07:57 PM
IRS Union gave Dems $23 for every $1 to GOP. Buzzfeed headline: GOP Took IRS Campaign Cash bit.ly/107xmuA— Political Math (@politicalmath) May 17, 2013 Well, give BuzzFeed credit for trying … and failing. We’ve learned from experience to be skeptical when headlines use the adjectives “GOP” or “Republican” as shorthand. The numbers don’t always add […]![]()

FSM Archives
blog comments powered by Disqus