
Riots by the insulted and furious are not exclusive to the Muslim world, although it has become a standard cultural exercise there. I remember the student demonstrations of 1968, furious demonstrations that spread throughout Europe and America. We came to think that "students" owned revolutions; but they are only cannon fodder. I was taking my doctoral oral exams at USC when the proceedings were interrupted by the sound of breaking glass across the campus. For months, I had moved the classes I taught out of doors after the ubiquitous false bomb threats. Why were students trashing their university?
Some of these students were genuinely outraged by their powerlessness in the face of adult authority. But others joined the riots---both young women and men---who often wound up in bed afterwards. Demonstrations unleash both adrenaline and sex hormones. Nobody is talking about this, but I think today's Muslim rioters are no different.
We have become accustomed to the sight of outraged screaming men who rally to the streets after every perceived "insult" to their religion. These rampagers are uniformly male, ranging from bearded Islamist with an agenda to what was described by one journalist watching the Cairo demonstrations as "football hooligans." I saw them myself on television, young men without beards dressed in western casual clothing. I wondered why these seemingly secular Muslims were out there. Were they really so insulted by this stupid film or was there another reason?
This is not to dismiss being insulted; Islam is insulted by the very primacy of the modern world, leaving them in the dust. But they are not insulted enough to avoid modern means of communication, weapons, and propaganda. Nor are they unwilling to produce their own insults: TV series such as the provocative and patently false Protocols of the Elders of Zion, a conspiracy story cooked up by the Russian secret police in 1899.
But looking at these young and seemingly modern men screaming in the street, my memory returned to the siege of the American Embassy in Tehran in 1979. Many of the shouting young men (and even women) were university students, but the real actors who went over the walls and took the embassy were bearded and much too long in tooth to be students. They were Islamist operatives.
Young men in the Muslim world have plenty to be unhappy about. They are unhappy that their economies are wretched, that there are few worthwhile jobs for them, that without jobs they cannot hope to marry, and they are bored. Family life in the Muslim world is very smothering and oppressive (by western standards). Getting out in the street and working up insulted outrage is an outlet for what might otherwise be directed against their authorities. And Muslim rage is a good cover for other agendas.
Note that the supposed "Muslim Spring" in Cairo was peopled by a very different lot. Our press interviewed charming, English-speaking techies who desperately wanted a modern society just like Europe. We did not consider how few there are like that in Egypt, in which the majority are ignorant, poor, and ready to believe any conspiracy rumor without question. The majority in the square were more or less secular and modern, and young women played a leading role. They paid for their boldness in being raped and beaten by both the police and the same Islamists who raped Lara Logan, a 60 Minutes journalist. Cairo is notorious for hordes of young, seemingly westernized men who prey upon any unaccompanied woman who dares appear in the public space. I see testosterone poisoning here.
The stupid anti-Islamic amateur movie was offensive, but the vast majority of rioters around the world had no way of seeing it. They were ready for a rumble, and the movie was a pretext, not a cause. The next time you see outraged mobs in the streets, consider the multiple psychological and sociological issues that have made them crazy. These demonstrations are never spontaneous. They are always organized and staged. Without the cameras there, they would melt.

FamilySecurityMatters.org Contributing Editor Dr. Laina Farhat-Holzman is a historian, lecturer, and author of How Do You Know That? You may contact her at Lfarhat102@aol.com or www.globalthink.net.

Join FSM and stay informed. Get your daily Security Update delivered each day to your e-mail.

Sen. Tom Coburn reportedly will seek spending offsets for Oklahoma relief money
May 20, 2013 09:47 PM
.@meredithshiner Really, Meredith? That's real classy.— Jason B. Whitman (@JasonBWhitman) May 21, 2013 @JasonBWhitman @meredithshiner Not to mention petty, no, moronic.— Scott Jones (@NScottJtx) May 21, 2013 Don’t forget Vanity Fair contributor Kurt Eichenwald. He’s worried about the answer too. And again, I ask the question: Will tea partiers call for offsets to pay for […]![]()
Karma, again: Liberals already tying Oklahoma relief efforts to Superstorm Sandy aid vote
May 20, 2013 07:34 PM
Residents of Oklahoma are all too familiar with tornado season, but there’s a new cycle that’s popped up in association with natural disasters; every major storm in a conservative area is now followed by claims of “karma”-driven payback linked to the House’s Sandy relief aid vote soon after the new year. It happened after tornadoes hit Georgia […]![]()
Scandals, schmandals: @WhiteHouse claims Obama is ‘all smiles'
May 20, 2013 06:22 PM
Or ever. When Jay Carney said this afternoon that senior White House staffers kept bad news from the president, maybe he was telling the truth! We kid, of course, but that would certainly explain this offering from the White House Twitter account, sent out during Carney’s disastrous press briefing: All smiles in the Oval Office. […]![]()
Frightening: Content from DOJ's warrant application to spy on James Rosen [pics]
May 20, 2013 05:22 PM
The news that Fox News reporter James Rosen was the victim of a Justice Department spying campaign is disturbing enough. But take a look at the DOJ’s search warrant application, in which it laid out its case for tracking Rosen’s movements and sifting through his personal emails, and the story takes an even more sinister turn. […]![]()
Another shoe to drop? Drudge editor suggests WH is sitting on another scandal
May 20, 2013 04:29 PM
Is it time to toss another shoe onto the White House scandal pile? Fresh on the heels of the explosive revelations about reporter James Rosen and other Fox News staffers being targets of a DOJ spying campaign, Drudge editor and Washington Times columnist Joseph Curl is tweeting about yet another possible White House scandal. CIA […]![]()

FSM Archives
blog comments powered by Disqus