
A judge in Arizona ruled Tuesday that police can immediately start enforcing the most contentious section of the state's immigration law, marking the first time officers can carry out the so-called "show me your papers" provision.
The decision by U.S. District Judge Susan Bolton is the latest milestone in a two-year legal battle over the requirement. It culminated in a U.S. Supreme Court decision in June that upheld the provision on the grounds that it doesn't conflict with federal law.
Now, with the requirement finally in full effect, both sides are anxious to see the outcome.
The supporters want local police to use it vigorously, but worry federal immigration officials won't respond to calls to come arrest people.
"I am mulling what I will do if they don't respond," said Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio, who more than any other police boss in the state pushed the bounds of immigration enforcement. "I don't feel comfortable letting the illegal alien back on the street."
Federal officials said they will check people's immigration status when officers call. But they'll only send an agent to arrest someone if it fits with their priorities, such as catching repeat violators and those who are a threat to public safety and national security.
Meanwhile, civil rights advocates are preparing for a battle.
- They're stepping up efforts to staff a hotline that fields questions about what people's rights are in case officers question their immigration status.
- If a police agency plans a special immigration patrol, volunteers armed with video cameras will be sent to capture footage, said Lydia Guzman, leader of the civil rights group Respect-Respeto.

Join FSM and stay informed. Get your daily Security Update delivered each day to your e-mail.


May 24, 2013 11:27 PM
While Sweden’s “youth” were continuing to set portions of the country on fire and a British soldier was nearly beheaded in the streets of London amid chants of “Allahu Akbar,” President Obama was delivering an update on the nation’s war on terror. He warned that America and its allies must remain vigilant for signs of terrorism, noting that […]![]()
Sarah Palin: Let's fund White House tours with Lois Lerner's salary
May 24, 2013 10:24 PM
As if it weren’t bad enough to learn that conservative-targeting IRS official Lois Lerner had been placed on paid administrative leave, Sen. Chuck Grassley let slip today that Lerner’s summer vacation with pay came only after she refused a request to resign. Sarah Palin proposed at least one alternative use for Lerner’s annual salary, not […]![]()
Political junkies anxiously anticipate Friday night document dump from White House
May 24, 2013 06:48 PM
We shouldn’t have to tell the White House that if there are any incriminating documents to leak, tonight’s the night to do it. Many are already on the road for a long holiday weekend, but the die-hard political junkies are still refreshing their browsers holding out for something. A resignation letter from Attorney General Eric […]![]()
DOJ: Eric ‘I Know Nothing' Holder vetted Rosen search warrant, did nothing illegal
May 24, 2013 04:39 PM
Remember last week, when Eric Holder insisted under oath that he had not personally been aware of any efforts by the DOJ to target journalists? And remember how he was busted yesterday for signing off on the criminal investigation of Fox News’ James Rosen? Guess what: it gets better. And by better, we mean much, […]![]()
Bombshell: Ryan Lizza reports that DOJ fought to conceal warrant from James Rosen
May 24, 2013 03:42 PM
Unreal. In an explosive new bombshell report, the New Yorker’s Ryan Lizza claims that the Obama administration deliberately kept Fox News reporter James Rosen in the dark about the warrant to search through his personal emails. The Obama administration argued it might need to monitor James Rosen's email account over lengthy period of time… newyorker.com/online/blogs/n…— Ryan […]![]()

FSM Archives
blog comments powered by Disqus