
Two years ago, July 29, 2010, Former Speaker of the House Newt Gingrich delivered a singularly astute and courageous address. Reactions to that speech across the political spectrum, whether immediate or delayed, illustrated the contemporary equivalent of what the greatest historian of Soviet Communist totalitarianism, Robert Conquest, appositely characterized as "mindslaughter" - a brilliantly evocative term for delusive Western apologetics regarding the ideology of Communism, and the tangible horrors its Communist votaries inflicted.
What did Newt Gingrich have the temerity to discuss? In defiance of our era's most rigidly enforced cultural relativist taboo, Mr. Gingrich provided an irrefragably accurate if blunt characterization of the existential threat posed by Islam's living, self-professed mission: to impose Sharia, its totalitarian religio-political "law," globally.
With vanishingly rare intellectual honesty and resolve, Gingrich described how normative Sharia - antithetical to bedrock Western legal principles - by "divine," immutable diktat, rejects freedom of conscience, while sanctioning violent jihadism, absurd, misogynistc "rules of evidence" (four male witnesses for rape), barbarous punishments (stoning for adultery), and polygamy:
Sharia in its natural form has principles and punishments totally abhorrent to the Western world, and the underlying basic belief which is that law comes directly from God and is therefore imposed upon humans and no human can change the law without it being an act of apostasy is a fundamental violation of a tradition in the Western system which goes back to Rome, Athens, and Jerusalem and which has evolved in giving us freedom across the planet on a scale we can hardly imagine and which is now directly threatened by those who would impose it.
Moreover, Gingrich warned about efforts - deliberate, or unwitting - to represent Sharia as a benign system:
So let me also be quite clear that the rules are radical and horrific. I think again it's fascinating that even when people go out and do polling and they say to, for example, Muslims in general, do you believe in Sharia, they don't then explain what Sharia is. Sharia becomes like would you like to be a Rotarian and it sounds okay.
Gingrich's unflinching portrayal of the existential threat Sharia represents - whether or not this totalitarian system is imposed by violent, or non-violent means - was accompanied by a clarion call for concrete measures to oppose any Sharia encroachment on the U.S. legal code:
Stealth jihadis use political, cultural, societal, religious, intellectual tools; violent jihadis use violence. But in fact they're both engaged in jihad and they're both seeking to impose the same end state which is to replace Western civilization with a [radical] imposition of Sharia.
The fight against Sharia and the madrassas in mosques which teach hatred and fanaticism is the heart of the enemy movement from which the terrorists spring forth. It's time we had a national debate on this. One of the things I'm going to suggest today is a federal law which says no court anywhere in the United States under any circumstance is allowed to consider Sharia as a replacement for American law.
Reminiscent of Conquest's earlier assessment of Leftist apologists for Communism - and anticipating reactions to his own speech, albeit from "See No Sharia" cultural relativists not confined to the Left - Gingrich also wondered:
How we don't have some kind of movement in this country on the left that understands that Sharia is a direct mortal threat to virtually every value that the left has is really one of the most interesting historical questions and will someday lead to many dissertations being written.
How appropriate then that late last evening ( (7/29/12) Politico posted New Gingrich's passionate and articulate defense of Michelle Bachman, and the four other intrepid House Representatives-Gohmert Franks, Westmoreland, and Rooney-demanding serious, formal Congressional investigation of the overall extent of Muslim Brotherhood influence operations.

Andrew G. Bostom, M.D., M.S. (Providence, RI), is the author of the highly acclaimed The Legacy of Jihad: Islamic Holy War and the Fate of Non-Muslims. He is an Associate Professor of Medicine in the Division of Renal Diseases at Rhode Island Hospital, the major teaching affiliate of Brown University Medical School. Dr. Bostom has published numerous articles and commentaries on Islam in the Washington Times, National Review Online, Revue Politique, FrontPage Magazine.com, American Thinker, and other print and online publications. More on his work can be found at www.andrewbostom.org, including a preview of his eagerly anticipated forthcoming book, The Legacy of Islamic Antisemitism: From Sacred Texts to Solemn History.

Join FSM and stay informed. Get your daily Security Update delivered each day to your e-mail.


Amanda Marcotte: GOP politicians obsessed with young women having sex
June 19, 2013 05:46 PM
Logic is not exactly Amanda Marcotte’s strong suit. Case in point: Marcotte can’t seem to wrap her head around the idea that Republicans are capable of having opinions about abortion. The only way she can explain it is that they’re icky: It is always unnerving to realize how many creepy Republican politicians were once gynecologists.— […]![]()
Chuck Grassley: IRS employees to receive $70 million in bonuses [correction added]
June 19, 2013 04:48 PM
After all the scandals & abuse of power coming from IRS, $70 million taxpayer dollars will be awarded to IRS employees in bonuses #IRS #tcot— CUCollegeRepublicans (@CampbellGOP) June 19, 2013 If this is true, it’s absolutely outrageous. According to Sen. Chuck Grassley, IRS employees are set to receive $70 million in bonuses. $70 million. From […]![]()
‘Occupied': Protesters blockade Chicago elementary school to protest closing [photos]
June 19, 2013 04:36 PM
Last month, the Chicago Board of Education voted to close dozens of schools, and one of them was Lafayette Elementary. According to recent tweets, there is now some sort of “occupation” of the school under way, as well as a protest forming outside. According to Twitter users on the scene, the blockade/occupation includes parents and […]![]()
Matthew Yglesias struggles to understand illegal immigration policy
June 19, 2013 04:08 PM
For once, Slate writer Matthew Yglesias is right. He is confused. His confusion comes in the wake of Ramesh Ponnuru’s observation that the Congressional Budget Office thinks the Gang of Eight bill will reduce future illegal immigration by only 25 percent. @RameshPonnuru writes CBO report has 'driven a stake through the heart of the Gang of […]![]()
Not so baller: Is the White House enlisting NBA to push Obamacare?
June 19, 2013 02:57 PM
Just how badly does Obamacare suck? Badly enough that President Obama is reportedly turning to the NBA to help him sell it: Set to the Jock Jamz soundtrack, Obama Administration "courts" (ha!) NBA players to sell #Obamacare. thehill.com/blogs/healthwa…— Ellen Carmichael (@ellencarmichael) June 19, 2013 From The Hill: Many have speculated that the enrollment campaigns would […]![]()

FSM Archives
blog comments powered by Disqus