
While conservatives might be in a bit of a post-election funk, this is no time to compromise our principles-especially on foreign policy and national security, where Team Obama's record has been less than stellar to say the least.
Rather, now is the time to dig deep and fight for the conservative principles that made this country the great and benevolent power it has been and should continue to be.
Surrender to the misguided efforts of this Administration on international affairs is by no means an option.
Instead, we should be insisting-indeed, demanding-that the following ideas become the bedrock of our foreign and national security policy:
American foreign policy really comes down to this question: Are this country's best days behind us, or are they yet to come?
The answer to that question is not pre-ordained-unless we refuse to speak out in the public square in the aftermath of the election for the conservative principles that made this country both great and exceptional.

Peter Brookes is a Senior Fellow for National Security Affairs at the Heritage Foundation and is a member of the U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission. He writes a weekly column for the New York Post and frequently appears on FOX, CNN, MSNBC, CNBC, NPR and BBC. He is the author of: "A Devil’s Triangle: Terrorism, Weapons of Mass Destruction and Rogue States." Mr. Brookes served in the U.S. Navy and is now a Commander in the naval reserves. He has over 1300 flight hours aboard Navy EP-3 aircraft. He is a graduate of the U.S. Naval Academy; the Defense Language Institute; the Naval War College; the Johns Hopkins University; and is pursuing a Doctorate at Georgetown University.
Peter Brookes is a Heritage Foundation senior fellow and a former deputy assistant secretary of defense.
peterbrookes@heritage.org
Twitter: @Brookes_Peter

Join FSM and stay informed. Get your daily Security Update delivered each day to your e-mail.


Jeb Bush can manage his way around those right-wing ‘chirpers'
June 17, 2013 10:22 PM
Noted ornithologist Jeb Bush today confirmed that the call of the right-wing “wacko bird” is the standard chirp, and he’s adept at ignoring the sound. The Washington Post reports that Bush, in an interview with the Christian Broadcasting Network, defended his conservative credentials and assured supporters, “I will be able to, I think, manage my way […]![]()
#TheyFeelPain, but: White House vows to veto ‘pain-capable' abortion bill
June 17, 2013 09:39 PM
In its coverage of the “Pain-Capable Unborn Child Protection Act,” which is headed to the House floor tomorrow, the New York Times was careful to note that the idea that a fetus can feel pain after 20 weeks is a “scientifically disputed theory.” Pro-lifers, though, used the #TheyFeelPain hashtag today to pressure legislators to at […]![]()
Porky: Immigration bill reportedly up to 24 pounds; Heaviest since Obamacare
June 17, 2013 08:21 PM
One thing that you never see and hear in Washington, D.C. is somebody looking at a piece of legislation and saying “have you lost weight?” That’s certainly not the case with the immigration reform legislation: Immigration bill largest since Affordable Care Act, weighs 24 pounds washingtontimes.com/news/2013/jun/…— WatersandHoodReport (@watersandhood) June 17, 2013 President Clinton taking healthy […]![]()
Rubio office steams about New Yorker ‘can't cut it' quote; NR's Rich Lowry confirms
June 17, 2013 07:14 PM
The above tweet references an article in the New Yorker written by Ryan Lizza. In the piece, Lizza quotes an unnamed staffer for Sen. Marco Rubio as saying a guest-worker program is a necessity because some American workers “can’t cut it.” National Review’s Rich Lowry, who mentioned the quote at NRO’s The Corner blog, pointed […]![]()
Bold claim: President Obama says he's not Dick Cheney
June 17, 2013 06:25 PM
Let’s be honest. We had never, ever, not for a second mistaken President Obama for former Vice President Dick Cheney. But now that Obama has reportedly claimed in an interview with Charlie Rose that he’s not Dick Cheney, we’re beginning to have our suspicions. Maybe the Huffington Post wasn’t that far off with its mock-up […]![]()

FSM Archives
blog comments powered by Disqus