Panetta Predicts an Israeli Strike on Iran

by DANIEL PIPES February 6, 2012
 
It's not every day that someone like the U.S. secretary of defense forecasts an ally's move but this just happened when Leon Panetta said that he believes, in the paraphrase of a Washington Post reporter, that "there is a strong likelihood that Israel will strike Iran in April, May or June." Thoughts on this unusual statement:
 
It's a paraphrase: For delicate statements, top officials prefer indirection and written words. It offers wiggle room and reduces tensions. Asked whether he disputed the Post report, Panetta inscrutably stated: "No, I'm just not commenting. What I think and what I view, I consider that to be an area that belongs to me and nobody else." (Contrast this episode with Barack Obama talking about drones in front of the cameras, an indiscretion that won him trouble, including a lawsuit from the ACLU.)
 
It might be disinformation: In the mirror world of nuclear diplomacy, we on the outside have almost no way of discerning wheat from chaff. Panetta could be sending a signal to Tehran as opposed to telling the truth. The same applies to other news, be it assassinations of Iranian nuclear scientists or sales of ordnance to Israel. Wait a decade to learn what's really happening now.
 
Tehran is determined: Iran's supreme guide, Ali Khamene'i, again confirmed that nothing and no one will impede his regime from acquiring nuclear weapons, announcing that "Sanctions will not have any impact on our determination to continue our nuclear course." I believe him. Just as the North Korean regime allowed its subject population to starve in the pursuit of nukes, so will the Iranians pay whatever the price.
 
Israel is also determined: The Israeli leadership looks back to the Holocaust and feels the weight of its responsibility. Commenting on those top-ranking military personnel who disagree with him and Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu about the Iranian nuclear danger, Israel's Minister of Defense Ehud Barak commented that "It's good to have diversity in thinking and for people to voice their opinions. But at the end of the day, when the military command looks up, it sees us — the minister of defense and the prime minister. When we look up, we see nothing but the sky above us."
 
U.S. presidential elections: Were the Israelis to attack Iran, Obama's response could have major electoral implications. Were he to approve or (especially) join in the attack, he would scramble the elections to his advantage. Were he to condemn the Israelis, however, he would likely pay a price. (February 4, 2012)
 
 
FamilySecurityMatters.org Contributor Daniel Pipes is director of the Middle East Forum, Taube distinguished visiting fellow at the Hoover Institution of Stanford University, and a contributor to FrontPageMagazine.com, and also the National Review Online. His blog can be read here.
 

Daniel Pipes is director of the Middle East Forum, Taube distinguished visiting fellow at the Hoover Institution of Stanford University, and a contributor to FrontPageMagazine.com.


blog comments powered by Disqus

'Douchecanoe' Rep. Peter King: Obama's tan suit 'a metaphor for his lack of seriousness'

August 29, 2014  06:16 PM

King said he wasn't trying to be trivial about the suit.

'Holy cow! I can't believe he said that': Obama drops another bombshell of stupid

August 29, 2014  05:53 PM

"Is he high?"

Monica Crowley on FBI threat assessment: 'This kind of BS is literally going to get us killed'

August 29, 2014  05:36 PM

The FBI omits Islamist terrorism from its domestic threat report.

Amateur Hour: State Dept. has resorted to 'crowdsourcing foreign policy'

August 29, 2014  04:32 PM

"Where else are we supposed to find a strategy?"

Joe Bastardi's forecast for Harry Reid gets a BIG 'thumbs up!'

August 29, 2014  04:07 PM

Storm on the horizon for the Senate Majority Leader?

FSM Archives

More in PUBLICATIONS ( 1 OF 25 ARTICLES )