Republicans Must Be Smart, Not Craven

November 15, 2012

As Congress reconvenes, Democrats are insisting that President Obama's re-election means that House Republicans are going to have to give in to his demands for tax increases on the wealthy. While this will do very little to actually solve the impending budget crisis, the president's supporters have a point when they claim that his victory means a majority of Americans supported his rhetoric about backing a balanced approach that would involve spending cuts in equal proportion to revenue increases. But as James Pethokoukis writes at AEI Ideas, a close look at what the president is asking for throws any notion of balance out the window.

It may be, as Bill Kristol pointed out on Fox News the other day, that it makes no sense for the GOP to "fall on its sword for a bunch of millionaires." Speaker John Boehner's initial offer to raise revenue by eliminating tax deductions for the wealthy was an indication that Republicans are prepared to start bargaining. And as Kristol said, there is an argument to be made that if the House leadership bargains the tax increase cutoff up, it may be good politics. But there should be no illusions that what the president is offering is a balanced plan in any sense of the word.

As Pethokoukis writes,

According to Obama's math, his "balanced" plan cuts the projected cumulative debt by $4.4 trillion over ten years with 36% of the reduction coming from a $1.6 trillion tax increases - 80% from wealthier Americans, 20% from business. So, basically, $2 in spending cuts for each $1 in tax hikes. "Balanced."

FINISH

 


blog comments powered by Disqus

10 year FSM Anniversary

Iowa Poll shows Hillary Clinton in nosedive, dropping to within 7 points of Bernie Sanders

August 29, 2015  09:03 PM

People are now saying they're seeing a replay of 2008 on the Democrat side.

Sheriff slams 'out of control' anti-police rhetoric after 'cold blooded execution' of deputy

August 29, 2015  03:55 PM

"Absolute madness."

'Constant projection': Debbie Wasserman Schultz gets reality-checks after noting GOP's 'rough week'

August 29, 2015  02:40 PM

Projection fail.

Why did Hillary say Ed Henry was only 'entitled' to 1 question? Unanswered follow-up is a dead giveaway

August 29, 2015  01:42 PM

The second question is the biggest clue to why Hillary stopped after the first question.

Unintentional hilarity alert: Guess why DWS didn't tell Martin O'Malley she was angry

August 29, 2015  11:33 AM

Because when you think "Debbie Wasserman Schultz," you think "nothing but class," right?

FSM Archives

More in MUST READS ( 1 OF 25 ARTICLES )