Russia exercises need for speed: Dangerous antics in Baltics hint at bigger plans

by DR. PETER BROOKES April 21, 2016

Will someone please call the Kremlin ASAP and ask them to remove all copies of the movie "Top Gunski" from the ready rooms of Russia's fighter pilots?

Their aerial acrobatics are dangerously out of control.

Not only is somebody going to get killed unnecessarily, but the jet jocks' capers could easily precipitate an international crisis - or worse - between two of the world's most powerful states.

Last week, we had a Russian Su-24 Fencer "buzzing" the USS Donald Cook operating in international waters in the Baltic Sea. On one pass of the American destroyer, the Fencer reportedly came within 30 feet of the ship.

Reminiscent of the "Gutsiest move I've ever seen, man" or, better yet, the "Stupidest move I've ever seen, Ivan," the U.S. warship seemed within its right to knock the Fencer out of the sky considering the potential threat it posed.

That was bad enough.

Then again last week after the Cook incident, we had a Russian Su-27 Flanker­ "hotdogging" it around a U.S. Air Force RC-135 reconnaissance aircraft also operating in international airspace over the Baltic Sea.

The Flanker reportedly came within 50 feet of the American four-engine jet and executed a "barrel roll" over the top of it, starting on one side of the RC-135, rolling up and over it, and coming down on the other side.

A maneuver best reserved for air shows.

While these events got lots of news coverage here, we've seen this sort of aggressive Russian air behavior a lot lately - meaning that these tactics aren't isolated incidents of bad judgment hatched locally, but instead are Russian national policy.

So what's at play here?

Russia and members of the NATO alliance are very unhappy with each other right now. The seizure of Ukraine's Crimea has left frontline states (Poland and the Baltics) nervous and the return of some U.S. troops to Europe to deter further Russian aggression has upped tensions.

More specifically, these egregious events in the air and at sea may revolve around a little-known place called Kaliningrad, a piece of Russian territory on the Baltic Sea wedged between NATO members Poland and Lithuania.

Russia is reportedly adding military muscle to this strategically-located outpost, which Red Army troops grabbed in 1945, giving rise to anxiety about what might be motivating Moscow's moves.

One possibility is that the Kremlin may try to seize a permanent pathway from Russia to Kaliningrad through Lithuania. It now relies on Lithuanian roads and rail - and political good will - for Kaliningrad's resupply.

The other worry is that, instead of a Lithuanian land grab for access to Kaliningrad, Russia could move against some or all of the Baltic States to (re)annex them. Kaliningrad would be critical in fending off a NATO military reaction.

While messing with NATO is a whole different fight from messing with non-NATO Ukraine, Russia's intentions are basically unknown regarding the Baltics, but the Crimea case is cause for concern.

So, despite the provocative aviation attempts at intimidation, it makes sense for us to continue operating in the Baltics at sea, in the air and on the ground to let Moscow know that we're watching - and we'll be ready - if Russia decides to roll.

Dr. Peter Brookes is a Senior Fellow for National Security Affairs at the Heritage Foundation and is a member of the U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission. He writes a weekly column for the New York Post and frequently appears on FOX, CNN, MSNBC, CNBC, NPR and BBC. He is the author of: "A Devil’s Triangle: Terrorism, Weapons of Mass Destruction and Rogue States." Mr. Brookes served in the U.S. Navy and is now a Commander in the naval reserves. He has over 1300 flight hours aboard Navy EP-3 aircraft. He is a graduate of the U.S. Naval Academy; the Defense Language Institute; the Naval War College; the Johns Hopkins University; and Georgetown University.

Peter Brookes is a Heritage Foundation senior fellow and a former deputy assistant secretary of defense.

Twitter: @Brookes_Peter

blog comments powered by Disqus

FSM Archives

10 year FSM Anniversary