See No Jihad: U.S. Still Treating Fort Hood Jihadis as Criminals

by ROBERT SPENCER August 16, 2012

Fort Hood jihad mass murderer Major Nidal Malik Hasan was in the news [1] again last week, when he was found in contempt of court for the third time and fined $3,000 for refusing to shave his beard. (He can afford it; he is still receiving his salary [2] from the U.S. military.) Also last week, a man who considers Hasan his hero and role model, Army soldier Naser Abdo, received a life sentence [3] for attempting to repeat Hasan's murderous attack at Fort Hood. Both cases demonstrate, in different ways, the abject failure of government and law enforcement officials to deal adequately with the challenge of Islamic jihad terrorism.

The judge who found Hasan in contempt again and fined him is treating the former Army psychiatrist as if he were a delinquent American soldier, which in a technical sense he is. But Hasan's beard is not just facial hair; it is a statement. It is his assertion that he is not an American at all, but a Muslim and a jihadist, someone who regards America as an evil enemy, the "Great Satan" indeed - an enemy that he believes must be fought against as a matter of divine principle. Hasan's beard is his silent declaration that he is an enemy combatant, and that it is ludicrous to try him as if he were in any meaningful sense an American soldier who has even the slightest degree of interest in following any of the rules of the U.S. military. And it is.

Hasan's beard and the reaction to it demonstrate the official unwillingness to face the reality of the Islamic jihad against the United States. They are another manifestation of the official determination to pretend that jihad does not exist. Finding Hasan in contempt of court for his beard is as wrongheaded as classifying his jihad attack as "workplace violence," and stems from the same wellsprings. Hasan is not an American soldier at all in any genuine sense, and should not be tried simply as if he were a military officer who committed a crime. But to do otherwise would be to acknowledge the existence of the jihad that officials are determined to ignore.

FINISH

 


blog comments powered by Disqus

Nick Searcy: ‘Libs don't give a damn about free speech' if conservatives are being attacked

May 20, 2013  11:23 AM

Bam! As Twitchy reported this morning, Fox News’ James Rosen was tracked and spied on by the Obama Department of Justice, according to the Washington Post. Chilling. MSM reaction so far: "Creepy what they did to Rosen (but hey, it's FoxNews, they wouldn't do that to us)— Justin Hart (@justin_hart) May 20, 2013 It a […]

Greenwald blasts Obama admin thug tactics against FNC's Rosen; Slams Obama cheering progs

May 20, 2013  10:12 AM

"War on Journalism."

Chilling report: Obama's DOJ spied on Fox News' James Rosen; Criminalizes reporting

May 20, 2013  09:22 AM

Unreal. This would make "Hugo Chavez blush."

NPR's Inskeep floats spin: Obama scandals only ‘catching fire' because nothing else is going on, guys

May 20, 2013  08:25 AM

Oh, lapdog. Bless your precious heart. Spin! Spin like the wind! Wave those Obama pom-poms madly! Inskeep appears to be desperately latching on to this “insight” from Dartmouth assistant professor Brendan Nyhan: Political Scientist Brendan Nyhan's analysis on why the time is ripe for an Obama scandal & you'll be surprised bit.ly/142hFZ8— Catherine Shuler (@rhetoricat) […]

Bill Maher: Don't you dare lower the legal blood alcohol limit, you nanny-staters!

May 19, 2013  08:38 PM

So lowering the blood alcohol limit is an unacceptable intrusion by the Nanny State (even though doing so probably would save lives). Gun control, on the other hand, is positively wonderful (even though the right to bear arms, unlike the right to drive, is protected by the U.S. Constitution): And nationalizing one-seventh of the economy in the name […]

FSM Archives

More in PUBLICATIONS ( 1 OF 25 ARTICLES )