While Republican congressmen arm-wrestle the White House, battling over sequestration and debt limits, the mother of all sea-battles is brewing in the Arabian Gulf. Whoever wins the budget struggle, it is likely the U.S. Navy will lose the fight to keep the Strait of Hormuz open, should Iran decide to close it.
There are awesome American naval forces in the Gulf that include carrier strike groups, cruisers, destroyers, guided missile frigates, submarines and other warships. These large targets are crammed into a very busy shallow body of water with one entrance: the Strait of Hormuz, 21 miles wide at its narrowest point.
Iran promises that if it suffers intolerable sanctions or a direct attack on its nuclear weapons program it will close Hormuz, choking off 35% of the world's oil traded by sea. The U.S. Navy vows to keep the vital waterway open. What, then, will happen if all of the mullahs' naval, land, and air weaponry is thrown against our fleet in the Gulf? We've known the answer for eleven years.
In 2002 the Pentagon held the largest war game in history: Millennium Challenge. [http:www.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Millennium_Challenge_2002] Costing $250 million and using hundreds of computers together with aircraft, ships, and 13,000 troops, the virtual battle closely mirrored reality. The Blue Force was a U.S. fleet entering the Gulf, led by senior admirals. The opposing Red Force, representing Iran, was commanded by retired Marine Lieutenant General Paul Van Riper. His only naval assets were speedboats, some loaded with explosives for suicide attacks, and vintage anti-ship cruise missiles. With such a meager force, Van Riper had to be clever. He decided on swarms of speedboats to attack Blue ships from all directions with missiles, rockets, mines, and a cloud of anti-ship cruise missiles. These multi-dimensional attacks were so quick and in such numbers they overwhelmed the Blue Force, leaving its commanders no time to analyze and counter the multitude of threats. It was over on the first day. Blue Force lost 16 major warships -- including the aircraft carrier. Then, instead of learning from the embarrassing lesson, the Pentagon did their usual thing. The exercise paused, rules were changed, and Blue Force won.
But the mullahs learned, and they know about asymmetrical warfare. Their naval forces now have anti-ship cruise missiles much more powerful than the one that crippled USS Stark in 1987. They have a growing fleet of speedboats including Bladerunner, capable of 83 mph. They have a fleet of submarines. Their drones are explosive-laden kamikazes. And they practice. They plan to create a 9/11 scenario including a burning, sinking, American super-carrier.
But that can be avoided. If Millennium Challenge Blue Force was defended by JLENS, it could have survived. What is that defense system? It has the ungainly name of "Joint Land Attack Cruise Missile Defense Elevated Netted Sensor System," [http://www.committeeonthepresentdanger.org/index.php?] but it should be called a combat commander's "eyes in the sky."
JLENS operates 24/7 for 30 days at a time, and sees the entire spectrum of threats: cruise missiles, aircraft, boats, vehicles, and even people planting roadside mines. During development, the system shot down cruise missiles at the Utah Test and Firing Range and, last June, it tracked swarming speedboats on Great Salt Lake. JLENS range of 340 miles gives an admiral in the Gulf long minutes instead of seconds to see, analyze, and defeat missiles and swarming boats before they reach his flagship. Combine JLENS with a B-2 bomber, and that admiral also has two hundred SDB-II homing bombs [ http://www.raytheon.com/capabilities/products/sdbii/ ] that can hit speedboats, day or night.
Army and Congress are now in the JLENS semi-finals. What will happen?
During the $2 billion dollar development program, Congress steadfastly supported JLENS as an essential defense system. It was kept alive, even through Army delays. For example, JLENS was to be tested in CENTCOM, near the Strait of Hormuz. Congress appropriated money, and Army dithered. If Army had acted, JLENS would be there today, watching the Gulf and looking deep inside Iran. But instead, Army announced the final JLENS field test would be at Maryland's Aberdeen Proving Grounds, and would not be completed until 2014.
Even JLENS cannot cover Hormuz from Maryland but, regardless, Congress must come to the rescue again and reprogram $30 million (money already appropriated) to get JLENS tested, produced, and sent to defend our troops in hot spots around the world. With speedy implementation, tests can be completed this year -- if Congress will refuse to be slow-rolled by Army.
Congress could start by asking Army to deliver test plans instead of holding feel-good town hall meetings with the grateful citizens of Aberdeen.
Chet Nagle is a Naval Academy graduate, a Georgetown Law School graduate, and Cold War carrier pilot who flew in the Cuban Missile Crisis. After a stint as a Navy research project officer, he joined International Security Affairs as a Pentagon civilian involved in defense and intelligence work. Afterwards, he lived abroad for 12 years working with Aeromaritime, Inc. and as an agent for the CIA, spending time in Iran, Oman, and many other countries. Along the way, he was founding publisher of a geo-political magazine, The Journal of Defense & Diplomacy, read in over 20 countries. At the end of his work in the Middle East, he was awarded the Order of Oman for his role in Oman's victory in a guerilla war fomented by communist Yemen. Nagle's first book is a fact-based novel about Iran's nuclear weapons program, IRAN COVENANT, available on Amazon. His second novel, THE WOOLSORTER'S PLAGUE, was published in 2010 and describes an attack on Washington by terrorists using a biological weapon. He and his wife Dorothy live in Virginia.
Join FSM and stay informed. Get your daily Security Update delivered each day to your e-mail.
Yep, as Twitchy reported, this is happening: A#BanBossy language-policing campaign launched by Facebook COO Sheryl Sandberg. We wonder if they will accept this compromise? If we're going to stop labeling little girls "bossy", can we stop labeling little boys with finger guns "psychotic latent mass murderers"?— David Burge (@iowahawkblog) March 11, 2014 Like. A. Boss. That […]
The views expressed in the articles published in FamilySecurityMatters.org are those of the authors. These views should not be construed as the views of FamilySecurityMatters.org or of the Family Security Foundation, Inc., as an attempt to help or prevent the passage of any legislation, or as an intervention in any political campaign for public office. COPYRIGHT 2013 FAMILY SECURITY MATTERS INC.