What do Mosques at German Schools Portend for Germany’s Future?
by DR. SAMI ALRABAA
October 12, 2009
A German court ruled last week that Muslims have the right to have their own mosques at German schools. Hence, the series of Muslims infiltrating German courts continues. If things go on like this in Germany, Muslims, led by radicals, would demographically and “democratically-legally” take over by 2070. They are exploiting religious freedom and terrorism to advance their agenda.
While Germany is receiving terrorist threats – the latest was two weeks ago – warning that al Qaeda would repeat 9/11 in Berlin and else where unless the German troops withdraw from Afghanistan, a German court in Berlin ruled that Muslim students have the right to have a separate room at their schools to pray, and critics of Muslim immigrants are severely attacked by both media and politicians.
Bekkay Horrach, a Moroccan-German Muslim immigrant and now a Taliban terrorist in Afghanistan and Pakistan, posted several video clips on the Internet from Wazirstan/Pakistan urging the German government to withdraw its troops from Afghanistan, otherwise “Jihad would come to Germany” and al Qaeda would activate its suicide and car bombers all over Germany.
Last week, a German court in Berlin ruled that Muslim students have the right to have a special room at school for prayers. The plaintiff, a 16-year-old Muslim Turk and his defense lawyer, backed by all Muslim organizations, were thrilled with the ruling, and triumphantly claimed that “justice was done.” They all hailed religious freedom in Germany and the constitution which they, in fact, reject.
The judge agued that religious freedom entails “…not only personal belief but also practicing this belief in public.”
The “Sate Council,” the local authority in Berlin, rejected the ruling and intends to appeal at a higher court. Some people who were present during the ruling said to me: “Imagine if all followers of other religions; Catholics, Protestants, Jews, Buddhists, etc. demanded the same? Half of the school rooms would be turned into temples. This is bizarre!”
Even a Muslim protested against the ruling. He said, “Murat (the plaintiff) could pray at home after school. I know from experience that many Muslims, especially those bigots, pray only in public in defiance of other religions and not out of piety.”
A woman commented, “Does that mean that schools which demand the same would have bells and Muezzins calling for prayers?”
A student who attends the same school, (Diesterweg-Gymnasium) told journalists, “I know Murat (the plaintiff), he doesn’t pray. Very often he comes late to class, claiming that he was praying. The truth of matter is he was smoking.”
Critics of Muslims are generally muzzled and branded as “politically incorrect” by the German mainstream media and public figures. Thilo Sarrazin, a member of the German Central Bank Board, is one of those critics. He has spelled out what the majority of Germans would love to say, but dare not. It is politically incorrect to blast Muslims for wrong doing.
In an interview with the magazine Lettre International, Sarrazin said that the majority of Turks and Arabs (most of them, 3 million, are Muslims) are unproductive and live at the expense of the taxpayers. He demanded that such people be sent back home. He also demanded that those who reject being integrated in the German society must be asked to go back home. Muslim immigrants cost the state yearly billions of euros.
In “Hart aber Fair,” a TV talk show, Sarrazin’s indignation was applauded by the majority of the participants and the public. Over and over again, when the German public is given the opportunity to express themselves, they do it bravely and oppose the apologists in the media and parliament, like members of the Green Party. The leadership of this party finds always “excuses” to accommodate radical and parasite Muslims.
More and more German universities are establishing institutes to train Muslim chaplains and imams to run the 2,700 mosques across Germany. One of these institutes is being prepared for at Osnabrück University. I traveled to Osnabrück and spoke with the teaching staff of the institute.
“How about those atrocious passages in the Koran and Hadith which incite to hatred, violence, and discrimination? Are you going to discuss them with your future imams?” I wanted to know.
Daniel, who does not want to be identified by his last name, said, “We’ll discuss these passages and hope that our graduates would not use them in mosques.” So it is just a hope that Osnabrück would not help training radical Muslims and release them to preach hatred, violence, and discrimination.
From experience and numerous studies, I know that practicing Muslims subscribe to every word in the Koran and Hadith. These scriptures, they believe, entail the word of Allah and his prophet Muhammad. I just wonder how imam training seminars in the heart of Europe will solve this predicament.
Gerhard Spörl describes Dick Cheney in Der Spiegel Online as a “leper” for “coining” the term “War on Terror.” In other words, there is no terror in the world, it is simply “propaganda” led by Cheney. Spörl also claims that America is not interested in peace and democracy in the Middle East. It is fighting a war for oil. According to Spörl, Cheney and Bush provoked terrorism across the globe.
Hamid Karzai, the Afghan president, said last week that his government and the allies are not only fighting the Taliban, they are also fighting more than 4,000 foreign terrorists.
Germany is getting ready to celebrate the twentieth anniversary of the fall of the Berlin Wall und the reunification of Germany. No media and no political figures seem to recall that it was Ronald Reagan who urged Mikhail Gorbachev to “Tear down this wall!” For some Germans, Reagan was also a “leper.”
I think that only when an egregious act like 9/11 happens in Germany, the German apologists might wake up and stop appeasing radical Muslims.
The German media welcomed the biased UN Glodstone Report on the war in Gaza and described it as balanced. For almost a year now, the German media have lamented and shed crocodile tears on the Palestinians in Gaza. The latest is posted by Der Spiegel Online. It is the story of a Palestinian man from Gaza who wants to marry a woman from the West Bank. The man has decided to smuggle her through one of those tunnels through which Hamas smuggles weapons into the Strip.
Der Spiegel Online wants to tell its readers, “You see how cruel the Israelis are? They do not allow poor Palestinians marry in peace.”
Hillary Clinton, the U.S. Secretary of State, is visiting some European countries this week. I hope that she would give Gordon Brown, the British Prime Minister, a piece of her mind and reprimands him for supporting the release of Abdelbasset Ali Al Megrahi, the thug who murdered 270 innocent people, from a Scottish prison. She should tell Brown that there are other prisoners in British jails who deserve to be released on “compassionate grounds,” but absolutely not the murders in the air over Lockerbie.
Barack Obama was awarded the Peace Nobel Prize for 2009. For what? For propagating that “Islam is a tolerant religion?” Who is the next winner of this Prize? Osama bin Laden or Hamas?
Muslims across the world have hailed the Oslo choice. They see in Obama a man who is supporting their “cause.” How do you expect Iran and North Korea to stop their nuclear weapons ambitions with a “peace” man like Obama?
Historically speaking, the majority of Germans were subjugated by biased individuals – Hitler, for instance, against the Jews – and eventually harvested destruction and misery. Now, in the 21st century, the biased are also in control: They control both the media and the parliament, and determine what is “politically correct.” The biased are slowly but steadily paving the way to radical Muslims to infiltrate the German society and eventually establish Sharia in a stone-aged Caliphate in Germany and across the globe. In two areas, the Islamists have so far been quite successful: demographically the Muslim population is growing faster than the non-Muslim population and institutionally they have infiltrated the legal system and other institutions. In all this the apologists have been of invaluable help.