The Obama presidency is fond of issuing apologies for America on the world stage, but very rarely makes them at home to Americans. White House Communications Director Dan Pfeiffer has just issued one to Washington Post columnist and Fox News contributor Charles Krauthammer, who last week wrote an op-ed berating the Obama administration for removing a bust of Sir Winston Churchill from the Oval Office when it came to power. Pfeiffer had issued a stinging attack on Krauthammer, alleging that his Churchill bust reference was "100 percent false." Krauthammer was of course 100 percent correct, and the British Embassy in Washington even issued a statement contradicting Pfeifer's remarks.
Here is the full text of Pfeiffer's mea culpa, published on the White House blog in the form of an open letter to Mr. Krauthammer:
Charles,
I take your criticism seriously and you are correct that you are owed an apology. There was clearly an internal confusion about the two busts and there was no intention to deceive. I clearly overshot the runway in my post. The point I was trying to make - under the belief that the Bust in the residence was the one previously in the Oval Office- was that this oft repeated talking point about the bust being a symbol of President Obama's failure to appreciate the special relationship is false. The bust that was returned was returned as a matter of course with all the other artwork that had been loaned to President Bush for display in his Oval Office and not something that President Obama or his Administration chose to do. I still think this is an important point and one I wish I had communicated better.


Join FSM and stay informed. Get your daily Security Update delivered each day to your e-mail.


Greenwald blasts Obama admin thug tactics against FNC's Rosen; Slams Obama cheering progs
May 20, 2013 10:12 AM
"War on Journalism."![]()
Chilling report: Obama's DOJ spied on Fox News' James Rosen; Criminalizes reporting
May 20, 2013 09:22 AM
Unreal. This would make "Hugo Chavez blush."![]()
May 20, 2013 08:25 AM
Oh, lapdog. Bless your precious heart. Spin! Spin like the wind! Wave those Obama pom-poms madly! Inskeep appears to be desperately latching on to this “insight” from Dartmouth assistant professor Brendan Nyhan: Political Scientist Brendan Nyhan's analysis on why the time is ripe for an Obama scandal & you'll be surprised bit.ly/142hFZ8— Catherine Shuler (@rhetoricat) […]![]()
Bill Maher: Don't you dare lower the legal blood alcohol limit, you nanny-staters!
May 19, 2013 08:38 PM
So lowering the blood alcohol limit is an unacceptable intrusion by the Nanny State (even though doing so probably would save lives). Gun control, on the other hand, is positively wonderful (even though the right to bear arms, unlike the right to drive, is protected by the U.S. Constitution): And nationalizing one-seventh of the economy in the name […]![]()
May 19, 2013 07:36 PM
No one is arguing that Acevdeo doesn't enjoy the same First Amendment rights as other citizens. The point is simply that it is unseemly for a high-ranking public official to address critics in such a harsh, vitriolic manner. ![]()

FSM Archives
blog comments powered by Disqus