Will the Perps Pay? Justice Needed for Benghazi

by DR. PETER BROOKES December 5, 2012

Lost in the hubbub over Who Knew What When (then changed it) about the Sept. 11 terror attack on our Benghazi consulate is one huge question: When do the terrorists pay for what they did?

We lost four brave Americans at the hands of a pro-al Qaeda group, Ansar al Sharia, and other extremists. In October, President Obama vowed to "hunt down the attackers."

Of course, we need to know what happened prior to the tragedy so we can prevent something like this from happening again. For example: Was there an intelligence failure that kept us from having advanced warning?

Plus: Why didn't we have enough security at the Benghazi consulate despite numerous requests from the staff in the field for more protection? And why wasn't US military assistance rendered during the attack?

We also have to know why Team Obama so badly bungled how they told us initially what happened, including why UN ambassador Susan Rice said what she said on those Sunday morning new shows.

(You remember: Rather than Benghazi being a terror attack, it was a copy-cat demonstration of the one in Cairo, which arose in response to an anti-Muslim video produced in the United States.)

These questions, and others, are important - and Congress needs to get to the bottom of it all.

But when will the terrorists who murdered Americans, including our ambassador, get their due?

From the outside, after nearly three months, it doesn't appear much is happening to bring the terrorists to justice.

Yes, the Libyans rounded up a few of the "usual suspects" in the days after the attack, but little more seems to be going on to get as many as 100 terrorists involved in the raid. (A Miami Herald report claims that the Libyans have actually arrested no one.)

Some feel the Libyan government is dragging its feet for fear of making enemies of the myriad powerful, well-armed extremist militias - which, more than a year after the revolution ended, still operate freely across the country.

Indeed, the person many believe responsible for the assault, Ahmed Abu Khattala, the leader of a wing of Ansar al Sharia, is still reportedly walking the streets of Benghazi. (He's denied involvement in the attack.)

Equally troubling, a Time report indicates that terrorist sympathizers or collaborators among Libya's law-enforcement and security services might be implicated in the attack.

OK, so the Libyans are basically paralyzed, but what are we doing?

Well, the FBI is investigating the case after a very late start. The State Department is also doing a report, and it's generally assumed that US intelligence is gathering information that will pinpoint the attackers.

Of course, before a US special- forces raid or a drone strike is conducted against those who did this, we'll need good intel to make sure we get the right people at a propitious time and place.

But as the old adage goes, punishment should be not only just, it should be swift. Yet "swift" is clearly no longer an option after nearly three months.

Our seeming inactivity and silence send a message to the terrorist world - loud and clear: We're not only inept, we're weak.

It'd be nice to think we're lulling the bad guys into a false sense of security before we act, catching them off guard. But, for the moment, we may also be giving them the sense that they have license to kill Americans with impunity.

Thankfully, if there's one thing terrorists understand - and respect - it's strength. Now would be a good time to show some, by bringing the Benghazi terrorists to account.

Dr. Peter Brookes is a Senior Fellow for National Security Affairs at the Heritage Foundation and is a member of the U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission. He writes a weekly column for the New York Post and frequently appears on FOX, CNN, MSNBC, CNBC, NPR and BBC. He is the author of: "A Devil’s Triangle: Terrorism, Weapons of Mass Destruction and Rogue States." Mr. Brookes served in the U.S. Navy and is now a Commander in the naval reserves. He has over 1300 flight hours aboard Navy EP-3 aircraft. He is a graduate of the U.S. Naval Academy; the Defense Language Institute; the Naval War College; the Johns Hopkins University; and Georgetown University.

Peter Brookes is a Heritage Foundation senior fellow and a former deputy assistant secretary of defense. 

Twitter: @Brookes_Peter

blog comments powered by Disqus

'Nailed it': Actor Donnie Wahlberg suggests media are 'very afraid' of Rubio

February 10, 2016  08:22 PM

"You know what's up."

The post ‘Nailed it’: Actor Donnie Wahlberg suggests media are ‘very afraid’ of Rubio appeared first on twitchy.com.

'You mean this guy? LMAO!!!!' Obama says he's not so keen on selfies [video]

February 10, 2016  07:17 PM

Raise your hand if you buy this.

The post ‘You mean this guy? LMAO!!!!’ Obama says he’s not so keen on selfies [video] appeared first on twitchy.com.

It's official: Chris Christie suspends presidential campaign

February 10, 2016  05:19 PM

Following his lukewarm performance in New Hampshire, Marco Rubio apologized to his supporters for his poor debate performance against Christie.

The post It’s official: Chris Christie suspends presidential campaign appeared first on twitchy.com.

'That's bad, right?' Hillary's email trouble might have just deepened (if that's even possible)

February 10, 2016  04:55 PM

"GOP conspiracy," eh?

The post ‘That’s bad, right?’ Hillary’s email trouble might have just deepened (if that’s even possible) appeared first on twitchy.com.

Gilmentum! Slowly but steadily, Jim Gilmore moves up in the GOP field

February 10, 2016  04:48 PM

Maybe Jim Gilmore's strategy is simply to let the other candidates destroy each other while he gradually picks up support.

The post Gilmentum! Slowly but steadily, Jim Gilmore moves up in the GOP field appeared first on twitchy.com.

10 year FSM Anniversary

FSM Archives