Off With Their Heads

by PAUL HOLLRAH December 22, 2008

My younger sister has often complained to me that, during their working careers, she and her husband had difficulty making ends meet, financially. In response, I’ve tried to convince her that those who have a little money… or even a lot of money… have a far more difficult problem: i.e., holding onto what they have. 

No man has done more to prove my point than Bernard Madoff, the head of Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities, LLC, a Wall Street investment advisor admired and trusted by some of America’s wealthiest individuals and foundations. No man has done more to destroy the faith of the American people in those who are entrusted with the responsibility for growing and managing the money they have set aside for their retirement years. 
 
Because of Madoff, millions of Americans are now laying awake at night questioning whether their stock portfolios, their mutual funds, and their annuities are safe and secure. In other words, have the bureaucrats in the Securities & Exchange Commission (SEC) done what they are charged with doing: regulating and policing the financial markets. In the case of Bernard Madoff they obviously did not, and it’s not because they weren’t warned.
 
In 2005, a Boston investment advisor and derivatives expert, Harry Markopolos submitted a nineteen-page report, anonymously, to the SEC saying it was “highly likely” that Madoff Securities was “the world's largest Ponzi Scheme.” Markopolos reminded the SEC that he had first brought the Madoff matter to the attention of their Boston field office in 1999, during the Clinton Administration, but no action was taken. In his report he recommended discretion, suggesting that he knew his research could ruin people's careers. He asked the SEC to be discreet about circulating the report, saying, “I am worried about the personal safety of myself and my family. Under no circumstances is this report or its contents to be shared with any other regulatory body without my express permission.” 

In his filing, Markopolos suggested two possible scenarios. Under Scenario #1, which he described a “unlikely,” he said, “I am submitting this case under Section 21A(e) of the 1934 Act in the event that the broker-dealer and (electronic communication network) depicted is actually providing the stated returns to investors, but is earning those returns by front-running customer order flow. Front running qualifies as insider trading since it relies upon material, non-public information, that is acted upon for the benefit of one party to the detriment of another party.”
 
Under Scenario #2, which Markopolos described as “highly likely,” he said, “Madoff Securities is the world’s largest Ponzi Scheme. In this case there is no SEC reward payment due the whistle-blower so basically I’m turning this case in because it’s the right thing to do.”
 
But, again, no action was taken against Madoff. Why? Is it because Madoff has friends in high places? We are already aware that the top recipient of cash from top executives in the sub-prime mortgage industry is Sen. Chris Dodd (D-CT), chairman of the Senate Banking Committee, that the second highest recipient of cash is none other than our President-elect, Barack Hussein Obama (D-IL), and that the largest recipient of cash in the House of Representatives is Cong. Barney Frank (D-MA), chairman of the House Financial Services Committee.
 
The Center for Responsive Politics has looked into the matter of the Madoff family’s political contributions between June 1993 and October 2008. Federal Election Commission records show that members of the Madoff family made some 250 political contributions to 45 candidates and committees totaling $391,350. The money went to 33 Democrats, 12 Republicans, and nine political committees… seven liberal and Democrat committees, one Republican committee, and one trade association PAC.
 
The largest individual recipients were Rep. Ed Markey (D-MA), $34,000; Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-NY), $31,000; Sen. Ron Wyden (D-OR), $25,000; Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton, $23,500; Rep. Richard Gephardt (D-MO), $12,000; Sen. Frank Lautenberg (D-NJ),  $6,600; and Sen. John Kerry (D-MA), $4,500. The Democrat Senatorial Campaign Committee, which Schumer currently chairs, received $104,050.
 
Among Republicans, the lion’s share of Madoff family contributions went, oddly enough, to Rep. Jack Fields (R-TX), $13,000. Sen. John McCain received $2,000. 
 
The records seem to suggest that Mrs. Ruth Madoff, the wife of Bernard Madoff, exhibits a bit of an “independent” streak, politically. On June 28, 2006 she made a $5,000 contribution to the New Republican Majority Fund, but by far her most interesting contribution was a $1,000 gift on June 27, 1996 to the Fund for a Responsible Future. Would it be too unkind to suggest that the fund must have fallen short of its goal?
 
So how did Madoff Investment Securities, “the world’s largest Ponzi Scheme,” escape detection for over a decade in both Democrat and Republican administrations? Did senior Democrats in Congress take steps to shield Madoff from SEC oversight? The SEC must be made to appear before Congress with all pertinent internal and external correspondence, including letters and meeting notes relating to Madoff’s communications with members of Congress. Those within the agency who had every opportunity to intervene, but didn’t, must be publicly exposed. 
 
As Harry Markopolos suggested in his 2005 exposé, hedge funds are often leveraged on a 4:1 ratio. If that is the case, and Madoff has been responsible for a $50 billion swindle, the impact across world financial markets could be $200 billion, or more. We simply cannot allow regulatory agency failures, whether through corruption or incompetence, to go unpunished. Off with their heads! 
 
FamilySecurityMatters.org Contributing Editor Paul Hollrah is a Senior Fellow at the Lincoln Heritage Institute.
 
 

blog comments powered by Disqus

Who's right: Donald Trump or Macy's?

 

mexico trump_macys_2015

Macy's has removed Donald Trump's products from their shelves because, while he stated that some of the Mexican people crossing our borders illegally are good people, some are murderers and rapists. While a true statement, it is not a "politically correct" statement, so Macy's has decided to pull his products from their shelves.

As a result of this, will you shop less - or not at all - in Macy's stores in the future?






10 year FSM Anniversary

Reporter offered more accurate job title for Hillary's 'organizing fellows'

July 03, 2015  01:08 PM

THAT'S more like it.

'Stop the spin doctoring': William Shatner defends George Takei

July 03, 2015  10:17 AM

Spin to end the spin?

Oregon's Minister of Thoughtcrime orders bakery to pay $135,000 to 'mentally raped' lesbian couple, stay silent about beliefs

July 02, 2015  11:53 PM

Bakery owners ordered not to talk about their reasons for refusing to make a cake for a lesbian wedding.

Rep. Alan Grayson declares it's time to stop fiddling while black churches (accidentally) burn

July 02, 2015  09:51 PM

When is the government going to get serious about racist lightning strikes?

Government assigns Independence Day homework: Hassle your Uncle Ted about Obamacare

July 02, 2015  07:02 PM

Great advice from the federal government: "You should be prepared when Aunt Janine says something like, 'Obamacare hasn't helped anyone!'"

FSM Archives

More in PUBLICATIONS ( 1 OF 25 ARTICLES )