SIGN UP - IT'S FREE!

Not a member? Sign-up

Forgot your password?

SEARCH FSM

FSM Archive                Search Must Reads


PetSmart

1-800-PetMeds

TigerDirect

HOME > PUBLICATIONS > Smile for the Spy Satellite Camera

  • IN THIS SECTION

Five Sept. 11 Suspects to Face Trial in New York

The Obama administration has announced it will try 9-11 mastermind Khalid Sheikh Mohammed and other 9-11 Gitmo detainees in a civilian federal court in New York, allowing them the protections of the U.S. Constitution even though they are not U.S. citizens.

Do you agree with this?






View results



Four Radical Chinese Muslims Transferred to Bermuda

Four Chinese Uighers (radical Chinese Muslims) were recently transferred to Bermuda. Do you think it's a good idea to release Gitmo detainees to idyllic vacation retreats?






View results


February 9, 2009

Smile for the Spy Satellite Camera

Gregory D. Lee

Come on, admit it. Fess up. No use denying it. You know who you are. You're the type of person who shudders when you learned that the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) is going to use spy satellites for domestic security and law enforcement missions. You panic because you think your right to privacy will be invaded and that the government will use the satellite to track your every move.
 
Well, calm down and get over it. This may come as a shock to you, but the government doesn't care what you’re doing, so long as it’s legal. 
 
Before the election I wasn’t surprised to read in the Wall Street Journal that liberals in Congress asked that the satellite program be further delayed pending a clear legal framework on how the program would operate. This request came up when there was a raging debate about the rules governing wiretaps and the interception of emails of suspected terrorists operating inside the country. Well, police can take still photos of you in public places and it is not a violation of your Fourth Amendment rights, and it does not require a court order.
 
The notion that a DHS satellite taking photos of public places invades one's privacy is a myth on the scale of other long-standing myths such as racial profiling, global warming and medicinal marijuana. There is no expectation of privacy in a public place, and the phrase "right to privacy" isn’t in the U.S. Constitution. Look it up.
 
I'm writing this because I know that many liberals, and some conservatives, are unnecessarily alarmed about the invasion of their privacy. These worry warts should seriously consider why the DHS wants to use spy satellites and cameras to enhance the nation’s security.
 
Satellite technology increases the security of people attending major sporting events like the Super Bowl, baseball games and other outdoor events. It can help investigators determine if a particular vehicle, boat or other conveyance they are searching for is somewhere without the knowledge of the bad guys.
 
Washington D.C. police now monitor live images from dozens of surveillance cameras located throughout high-crime areas of the city. One officer, who might be recuperating from a minor injury, can observe several monitors to look for criminal activity. The cameras serve as police manpower multipliers.
 
Personally, I will feel better the next time I visit our nation’s capital, now that I know the police are using a video surveillance system. It just might deter some creep from going through my wife's purse or picking my pocket. And if such events do take place, it will give the police a tremendous investigative lead in identifying a suspect. What's wrong with that?
 
Today, videotaping public places by government and private industry is so commonplace that in many criminal trials juries expect to see a videotape of the actual crime. In fact, if the police do not have a tape of a significant event related to a specific criminal investigation, such as a dealer selling drugs to an undercover police officer, defense attorneys will often accuse the police of having something to hide. 
 
Video surveillance has been proven to be extremely effective in identifying suspects during the investigations of the terrorist events in London and elsewhere. It provides a permanent record of who was there and what they were doing. Knowing there is a surveillance camera watching you as you loiter in or transit through a public place serves as a deterrent to anti-social behavior, like robbing someone or planting a bomb. 
 
So if you are offended by a government satellite taking your photo, or the police videotaping you in a public place while you are engaged in purely innocent behavior, I feel sorry for you. Paranoia is a terrible thing, but if you seriously consider all the benefits associated with modern video surveillance, your paranoia should give way to a feeling of security.
 
Come on, admit it.
 
FamilySecurityMatters.org Contributing Editor Gregory D. Lee is a retired DEA Supervisory Special Agent. He writes a weekly syndicated column for North Star Writers Group and can be reached through his website: www.gregorydlee.com. 

Reader Comments: Submit Your Comment (0)

Print This
Share It: 
Submit to: Digg Submit to: Del.icio.us Submit to: Facebook Submit to: StumbleUpon Submit to: Newsvine Submit to: Reddit