November 20, 2009
An Abridgement of Constitutional Rights
Nancy Salvato
The objectives for the United States Constitution are outlined in its preamble. Read it putting emphasis on the action verbs.
“We the people of the United States, in order to form a more perfect union, establish justice, insure domestic tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general welfare, and secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America...”
All the objectives for the Constitution were chosen carefully and reflect the concerns, which surfaced around The Articles of Confederation, this country's first Constitution.
Read this again, but with a renewed emphasis on certain elements.
We the people of the United States, in order to form a more perfect union, establish justice, insure domestic tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general welfare, and secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.
This exercise, done in a variety of ways, can be quite useful in analyzing the document. Officials elected to serve in the federal government should read these words carefully, meditate on them, and think about whether their actions in the name of “we the people” are aligned to these objectives. It helps if the words of the preamble are studied in the context of the time period in which they were written.
Public officials need to take seriously their oath to uphold the Constitution. Just as important, the people of the United States, charged with electing these officials to public office, should spend time on this exercise. After giving the Constitution proper consideration, we should ponder an important question. We should give serious thought to whether public apathy or indifference to the workings of the government has played a role in allowing heretofore acknowledged 1st Amendment Rights under the Constitution to become abridged.
Think for a moment about the 1st Amendment.
“Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.”
“In the United States, of course, displays of the Ten Commandments or Christian symbols are relentlessly hounded out of public spaces by the ACLU and similar groups, while Muslims are granted prayer rooms, foot baths, and all the other accoutrements of their faith wherever they demand them.” – Creeping Sharia
...or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press
"'Hate crime' laws work this way: They add penalties to a criminal sentence if the criminal is also convicted of having a ‘hateful' intent toward the victim based on the victim's real or perceived group identity. Crime victims who don't fit into certain categories see their assailants face lesser penalties. Ultimately, ‘hate crime' laws punish only beliefs or thoughts.” – 'Hate Crime' Laws
Regarding freedom of the press, net neutrality legislation threatens the new media, a powerful medium for bringing information to “We the People.”
“A new regulatory structure such as net neutrality makes no economic sense. When a powerful third party, such as a federal agency, regulates a scarce resource, such as broadband capacity, the market itself becomes subject to political whims and special-interest carve-outs, which will only harm consumers.”
With regard to the right of the people peaceably to assemble House Speaker Nancy Pelosi writes this in USA Today.
“It is now evident that an ugly campaign is underway not merely to misrepresent the health insurance reform legislation, but to disrupt public meetings and prevent members of Congress and constituents from conducting a civil dialogue. These tactics have included hanging in effigy one Democratic member of Congress in Maryland and protesters holding a sign displaying a tombstone with the name of another congressman in Texas, where protesters also shouted "Just say no!" drowning out those who wanted to hold a substantive discussion. These disruptions are occurring because opponents are afraid not just of differing views — but of the facts themselves. Drowning out opposing views is simply un-American.”
According to the First Amendment Center,
“First Amendment freedoms ring hollow if government officials can repress expression that they fear will create a disturbance or offend. Unless there is real danger of imminent harm, assembly rights must be respected.”
...and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances
“Petition is the right to ask government at any level to right a wrong or correct a problem.” – First Amendment Center
Because this is a fundamental liberty, one has to wonder why the people have no standing to request any branch of government, including the Judiciary, to correct a problem. In the case of President Obama,
“Contrary to what you may have read, no document made available to the public, nor any statement by Hawaiian officials, evidences conclusively that Obama was born in Hawaii.” – American Thinker
In his Report of the Commissioners for the University of Virginia, Thomas Jefferson writes about “the objects” of “primary education." Though each one of these objectives is important in its own right, the learning of civic responsibility stands out because somewhere along the line, these were cut from the list of priorities for education in this country.
1) To give to every citizen the information he needs for the transaction of his own business;
2) To enable him to calculate for himself, and to express and preserve his ideas, his contracts and accounts, in writing;
3) To improve, by reading, his morals and faculties;
4) To understand his duties to his neighbors and country, and to discharge with competence the functions confided to him by either;
5) To know his rights; to exercise with order and justice those he retains; to choose with discretion the fiduciary of those he delegates; and to notice their conduct with diligence, with candor, and judgment;
And, in general, to observe with intelligence and faithfulness all the social relations under which he shall be placed.
Perhaps this Readers Digest version of our Rule of Law is the result of living in an age where mainstream news is provided in 30 second sound bites; an age in which people exhibit an unhealthy obsession with movie or sports personalities and mistake their opinion to be informed; and an age in which the system of public education relegates learning about the origin of these rights, the reasoning behind the formulation of the specific goals set for this Constitutional Republic, and the civic responsibility necessary to maintain our liberties. All of this relegates what Thomas Jefferson believed should be considered part of the basics in any system of education, below the special interest topics that dominate the curriculum in our schools. Perhaps it is because “We the People” allowed it to happen on our watch.
FamilySecurityMatters.org Contributing Editor Nancy Salvato is the President and Director of Constitutional Literacy Program for Basics Project, a non-profit, non-partisan 501(c)(3) research and educational project whose mission is to re-introduce the American public to the basic elements of our constitutional heritage.
Every September, I recall that is more than 65 years since I landed
at Nagasaki with the 2nd Marine Division in the original occupation of
Japan following World War II. This time every year, I have watched
and listened to the light-hearted "peaceniks" and their light-headed
symbolism-without-substance of ringing bells, flying pigeons, floating
candles, and sonorous chanting and I recall again that "Peace is not a
cause - it is an effect."
In July, 1945, my fellow 8th RCT Marines [I was an ARman] and I returned to
Saipan following the successful conclusion of the Battle of Okinawa. We were
issued new equipment and replacements joined each outfit in preparation for
our coming amphibious assault on the home islands of Japan.
B-29 bombing had leveled the major cities of Japan, including Kobe, Osaka,
Nagoya, Yokohama, Yokosuka, and Tokyo.
We were informed we would land three Marine divisions and six Army
divisions, perhaps abreast, with large reserves following us in. It was
estimated that it would cost half a million casualties to subdue the
Japanese homeland.
In August, the A-bomb was dropped on Hiroshima but the Japanese government
refused to surrender. Three days later a second A-bomb was dropped on the
city of Nagasaki. The Imperial Japanese government finally surrendered.
Following the 1941 sneak attack on Pearl Harbor, a Japanese admiral said, "I
fear all we have done is to awaken a sleeping giant..." Indeed, they had.
Not surprisingly, the atomic bomb was produced by a free people functioning
in a free environment. Not surprisingly because the creative process is a
natural human choice-making process and inventiveness occurs most readily
where choice-making opportunities abound. America!
Tamper with a giant, indeed! Tyrants, beware: Free men are nature's pit
bulls of Liberty! The Japanese learned the hard way what tyrants of any
generation should know: Never start a war with a free people - you never
know what they may invent!
As a newly assigned member of a U.S. Marine intelligence section, I
had a unique opportunity to visit many major cities of Japan, including
Tokyo and Hiroshima, within weeks of their destruction. For a full year I
observed the beaches, weapons, and troops we would have assaulted had
the A-bombs not been dropped. Yes, it would have been very destructive
for all, but especially for the people of Japan.
When we landed in Japan, for what came to be the finest and most humane
occupation of a defeated enemy in recorded history, it was with great
appreciation, thanksgiving, and praise for the atomic bomb team, including
the aircrew of the Enola Gay. A half million American homes had been spared
the Gold Star flag, including, I'm sure, my own.
Whenever I hear the apologists expressing guilt and shame for A-bombing and
ending the war Japan had started (they ignore the cause-effect relation
between Pearl Harbor and Nagasaki), I have noted that neither the effete
critics nor the puff-adder politicians are among us in the assault
landing-craft or the stinking rice paddies of their suggested alternative,
"conventional" warfare. Stammering reluctance is obvious and continuous, but
they do love to pontificate about the Rights that others, and the Bomb, have
bought and preserved for them.
The vanities of ignorance and camouflaged cowardice abound as license for
the assertion of virtuous "rights" purchased by the blood of others - those
others who have borne the burden and physical expense of Rights whining
apologists so casually and self-righteously claim.
At best, these fakers manifest a profound and cryptic ignorance of causal
relations, myopic perception, and dull I.Q. At worst, there is a word and
description in The Constitution defining those who love the enemy more than
they love their own countrymen and their own posterity. Every Yankee Doodle
Dandy knows what that word is.
In 1945, America was the only nation in the world with the Bomb and it
behaved responsibly and respectfully. It remained so until two among us
betrayed it to the Kremlin. Still, this American weapon system has been the
prime deterrent to earth's latest model world- tyranny: Seventy years of
Soviet collectivist definition, coercion, and domination of individual human
beings.
The message is this: Trust Freedom. Remember, tyrants never learn. The
restriction of Freedom is the limitation of human choice, and choice is the
fulcrum-point of the creative process in human affairs. As earth's
choicemaker, it is our human identity on nature's beautiful blue planet and
the natural premise of man's free institutions, environments, and respectful
relations with one another. Made in the image of our Creator, free men
choose, create, and progress - or die.
Free men should not fear the moon-god-crowd oppressor nor choose any of his
ways. Recall with a confident Job and a victorious David, "Know ye not you
are in league with the stones of the field?"
Semper Fidelis
Jim Baxter
Sgt. USMC
WW II and Korean War
point-man/follower of The Lion of Judah
5th Grade Teacher - 30 wonderful years!
vincit veritas
The Human Paradigm: Earth's Choicemaker Psalm 25:12
posted by: Jim Baxter
Saturday, February 26, 2011 at 03:56 PM
