SIGN UP - IT'S FREE!

Not a member? Sign-up

Forgot your password?


PetSmart

1-800-PetMeds

TigerDirect

HOME > PUBLICATIONS > Do We Finally Have Proof that Global Warming by CO2 Emissions is a Hoax?

  • IN THIS SECTION

Health Care - March 2010 Vote


Do you think Congress will pass the current form of the Health Care bill this week?






View results

Senior Intelligence Officials: Attempted Terror Attack "Certain"

The five senior leaders of the U.S. intelligence community told a Senate panel they are "certain" that terrorists will attempt another attack on the United States in the next three to six months.
If true, why do you think the jihadists feel emboldened?






View results




February 9, 2010

Do We Finally Have Proof that Global Warming by CO2 Emissions is a Hoax?

The Editors

Recently, NASA Director James Hansen was challenged by Hungarian Physicist Dr. Miklos Zagoni and Dianna Cotter, a Contributing Editor to FamilySecurityMatters.org, to release the raw numbers data Hansen used to report that 2009 was the warmest year on record. NASA incorrectly states that our surface atmosphere can hold infinite amounts of heat. Instead, the discovery of Atmospheric Equilibrium by Dr. Ferenc Miskolczi proves Global Warming by CO2 emissions a hoax.
 
The challenge can be found in this open letter to Dr. Hansen, made public by the authors for the first time.
Open Letter to:Dr. James Hansen (NASA GISS)
Dear Dr. Hansen:
 
On January 22, 2010 you published a statement: “2009: Second warmest year on record.”
As we all know, the global average surface temperature is a sum of two quantities. One is the so-called effective temperature, determined by the available incoming energy (depending on the solar constant, planetary albedo [reflectivity] and internal heat sources as ocean-atmosphere heat exchange, industrial heat generation and so on), now about 255 Kelvin or minus 18 Celsius.
 
The other is the greenhouse temperature, coming from the presence of infrared-active gases (H2O, CO2, methane, ozone, etc.) and clouds in the atmosphere, generally accepted as about 33 degrees Celsius. These two give up the known 288 K (+15 C) global average surface temperature.
 
Would you be so kind as to produce a separation of your temperature data, year by year, into the above mentioned two parts? This would show us whether Global Warming is happening in the effective, or in the greenhouse part of the global temperature.
 
After the results of Dr. Ferenc Miskolczi, former NASA Langley Research Center senior research scientist, stated that the observed warming is happening in the effective temperature while the greenhouse addition fluctuates around its 33C equilibrium value, this shows no growing trend in the past half century.
 
The opportunity for such a project is given, as the White House said NASA will be directed to concentrate on Earth-science projects – principally, researching and monitoring climate change. We suggest here not to research and monitor the conventional climate change issue, but greenhouse effect itself.
 
Looking forward your answer,

Dr. Miklos Zagoni, Dianna C. Cotter
Budapest, Hungary; Portland, Oregon USA February 3, 2010
 
We all look forward to Dr. Hansen’s response, and when the authors of this letter receive that response, we will publish it here as well.
 
Brought to you by the editors and research staff of FamilySecurityMatters.org.

Reader Comments: Submit Your Comment (2)

Let's be honest, you climate cowards out there, who are still foolishly believing in this CO2 mistake POST Climate Gate, we know that until we personally suffer from the effects of your bull$hit climate crisis, public support for your bull$hit will keep plummeting. Your fantasy crisis can't hide forever in the convenient sanctuaries high atop remote mountains and at polar caps and deep in the oceans and jungles. Promising death is not sustainable so you can all cry "they say" and constantly redefine your Greenzi dogmatic terminology all you want but your fear mongering obviously can't be a sustainable "threat" forever.
And besides, if we WERE actually experiencing this crisis, we wouldn't be challenging your cowardly promise of death for my kids in the first place. If scaring my kids isn't bad enough, you misguided fools continue to do it post climate gate. Truth is what works so why would you sickos pray,hope and wish for this misery to happen? Is fear your only motivator? Do you global doomers rubber neck car accidents too? Do you look your kids in the eyes when promise them death with SAVE THE PLANET? By spring you modern day witch burners will look like the very last guy to ever show up at the party in disco duds. Funny isn’t it how this modern day witch burning is just like religion, not science. Science demands truth, but your lab coat consultant science makes a virtue out of NO evidence and its been over 24 years of predictions now.

Preserve, protect and respect Nature, not save it from an envio WMD war and non existent enemy of climate VARIATION.

posted by : Meme Mine
Tuesday, February 9, 2010 at 05:47 PM

Anthropogenic Global Warming and other pet peeves of the enviro-fascists is not about saving the planet.

We (the sensible) get caught up in the minutae, data and the hard facts while failing to see that such issues are merely smokescreens and vehicles for the real agenda: Ending or crippling capitalism.

posted by : Philip
Tuesday, February 9, 2010 at 08:23 PM

Print This
Share It: 
Submit to: Digg Submit to: Del.icio.us Submit to: Facebook Submit to: StumbleUpon Submit to: Newsvine Submit to: Reddit