SIGN UP - IT'S FREE!

National Debt Clock


A million seconds pass in 12 days.
A billion seconds pass in 31 years.
A trillion seconds pass in 31,688 years!

Eurabia Watch


Family Security Matters has started a new feature, called Eurabia Watch, which will warn Americans that what happens in Europe with political correctness and Islamism will soon be on its way to America. What do you think?







View results


Sign Up for FSM Updates!

HOME > PUBLICATIONS > Exclusive: Update: Rep. Sue Myrick’s ‘Wake Up America’ Agenda

July 29, 2008

Exclusive: Update: Rep. Sue Myrick’s ‘Wake Up America’ Agenda

The Editors

Print This
  Comments (0)

Back in March FamilySecurityMatters.org told you about U.S. Rep. Sue Myrick’s (R-N.C.) ‘Wake Up America’ agenda, a ten-point strategy designed to alert and educate Americans to terrorist threats posed by radical Islamic extremists here at home.
 
One of Myrick’s goals is to “explain to people what the roadblocks are” regarding the fight against terrorism in the United States, and she feels “very strongly about the infiltration” by those who would do us harm “that’s taking place in America.” The entire agenda can be found here.
 
Since then, Rep. Myrick has made impressive progress in the implementation of her agenda:
 
U.S. Military Chaplain Program
 
Actions:
 
  • On June 4, 2008, Rep. Myrick sent a letter to Department of Defense Secretary Robert Gates inquiring if the Department of Defense has reexamined its chaplain approval process for the military since the arrest and conviction of Abdurahman Alamoudi.
     
  • On June 25, 2008, the Department of Defense (DoD) replied to Rep. Myrick with a letter and packet containing the DoD Inspector General’s (IG) evaluation report on the DoD Chaplain Program, which was finished in November of 2004.  The packet also included the DoD guidelines for the appointment of chaplains for the military service.

The DoD IG report had five observations and suggestions to strengthen the DoD Chaplain Program.  However, the concern is that Observation 3 was not adopted: 
 
        Observation 3 suggested DoD establish nonreligious criteria that would allow DoD to withdraw or remove a religious organization or its agent from participating in the DoD chaplain program.  Such examples of non-religious criteria suggested were advocating the violent overthrow of the US Government, listed on a watch list of terrorist organizations, or conviction of a religious organization or its principal leaders in connection with terrorism.  Observation 3 also included suggestions to use the FBI or other agencies to help screen religious organizations and their agents.  The DoD rejected this observation because they said that it was “legally problematic” and the DoD was focused on individual merit of the prospective Chaplin, while the IRS “should remain the focal point for institutional merit” (IRC- 501 (c) (3) criteria).  NOTE: DoD has adopted part of this observation, which includes: removal and rejection of chaplains and religious organizations that are under indictment or have been convicted of a terrorist related offense, or if the religious organization appears on the State Department list of Foreign Terror Organizations.

  • On July 16, 2008, Rep. Myrick sent another letter to DoD. (typo date on letter)  In this letter she expresses that they didn’t address Alamoudi directly and lists 7 specific questions about the program and their efforts to ensure that chaplains serving in our military do not have the same radical ties as Alamoudi.  


Conclusion/Future Actions:
 
  • Rep. Myrick believes that DoD should fully adopt Observation 3 in the DoD IG report, and even go further by creating a very strict vetting process.  The DoD should do more to screen religious groups than merely rely on the IRS, Department of Justice court cases or prosecutions, or the Department of State.  Common sense also point to the fact that those wishing to infiltrate the system will not do so under the guise of a known terrorist organization.  DoD should use FBI and CIA resources to help them ensure radical elements do not have a foothold in the DoD Chaplin Program, or anywhere in the DoD.  Rep. Myrick is currently considering ways to push DoD to action on this matter. 
     
  • Rep. Myrick is awaiting a response to her most recent letter and then may request more information, or may begin to set up face to face meetings with Pentagon officials on this issue.


Action items:
 
  • Citizens wishing to get involved in this issue should contact the Department of Defense and ask them to:
     
    1. Consider setting up a process by which they vet religious organizations, based on their own strict standards, and not go merely based on the IRS’ tax status, Department of Justice indictments or convictions, or Department of State watch lists. 
    1. Answer Rep. Myrick’s questions and release the information to the public about those who were placed in to the military’s chaplain program by Alamoudi and the organizations of which he was associated.


*You can email the Department of Defense and leave a comment with this webform.
 
Federal Bureau of Prisons Chaplain Program
 
Actions:
 
  • On June 4, 2008, Rep. Myrick sent a letter to the director of the Federal Bureau of Prisons, Harley Lappin, asking him to reexamine its chaplain approval process since the arrest and conviction of Abdurahman Alamoudi.
     
  • On June 25, 2008, the Federal Bureau of Prisons responded with a letter that stated they had been investigated by the Office of the Inspector General and had updated their practices after the IG 2004 report.  They also stated that they had not had any connection with Alamoudi or his organizations. 
     
  • Based on the answers in the letter, Rep. Myrick followed up with a phone call to the Director of the Chaplain program in the Federal Bureau of Prisons (FBOP).  Rep. Myrick’s discussion found:
     
    • The FBOP uses their own staff to review applicants.  They do not use outside religious agents. 
    • They do a good job of background checks to ensure the applicant has no radical ties.
    • Sermons are English only.  The only time an inmate can speak in a foreign language during a religious service is for religious prayer recitations.  The inmates are very well monitored and supervised during these times.
    • They have inventoried and screened books, videos, recordings, etc. to ensure religious material has no radical messages.
    • They work closely with the FBI to recruit chaplains.  They also work closely with the National Joint Terrorism taskforce if they feel a prisoner is being radicalized.     
    • They have a strong comprehensive plan in place to control radicalization and work to help states develop strong plans as well.

Conclusion/Future Actions:
 
·         Rep. Myrick believes the Federal Bureau of Prisons understands the infiltration of radicals into our system and is doing all they can to ensure they do not get a foothold in the prison system. They are also doing a very good job to prevent radicalization in the federal prison system. There are concerns that they still use ISNA (Islamic Society of North America) to suggest chaplains, however, the use of the FBI coupled with their vetting processes helps damper any major concerns.   

·          After Rep. Myrick’s phone conversation, she feels that attention now needs to be turned to the state prison systems.  The Federal Bureau of Prisons works with several groups and organizations to help share best practices with state prisons in order to help them increase their standards for vetting religious providers as well as preventing radicalization.  Rep. Myrick plans to contact these organizations and ensure they have strong standards and can push the state prison systems to adopt these standards.  Rep. Myrick will also consider creating a grant program for state prison employees to get training from the Federal Bureau of Prisons, or other groups, to learn how to better vet religious providers and counter religious radicalization of their inmates. 
 
Action items:
 
  • Citizens wishing to get involved in this issue should contact their Governor and  director of their state prison system and ask them to:
     
    1. Make public their policy for vetting religious providers to ensure they have no radical elements, as well as make public their policies regarding how they review religious materials being distributed to inmates to ensure there are no radical teachings. 
    1. Make public any religious groups or organizations that are allowed to give sermons or religious guidance to prisoners. 
    1. Ask them if they follow the same standards used by the FBOP, and suggested by the American Correctional Association (http://www.aca.org/), regarding proper vetting of religious providers, and countering religious radicalization in their prisons.
    1. Ask them if they monitor communications (phone calls/letters) of prisoners that are suspected to have radical ties, or are suspected of being radicalized by religious groups.
    1. Ask them if they send their employees to any training conferences or programs to help them better update and develop policy regarding religious radicalization in their prison system.
    1. Ask them if they notify the National Joint Terrorism Taskforce if they feel that an inmate being released has been radicalized and may have ties to terrorist organizations.
*State prison system contact information can be found here.
 
 Religious Visa Reciprocity
 
Actions
 
  • Rep. Myrick has introduced legislation that would deny religious visas to those whose country denies our citizens reciprocal religious visits to their country.  The bill number is H.R.6590.
     
  • Rep. Myrick has signed onto Rep. Anthony Weiner’s bill, H.R.2981, which would halt the issuance of visas to citizens of Saudi Arabia until the President certifies that the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia does not discriminate in the issuance of visas on the basis of religious affiliation or heritage.
     
  • Rep. Myrick has instructed the Congressional Research Service to compile a list of countries who deny our religious workers access to their country.  This will give us a better picture of what countries discriminate against us based on religion.

Conclusion/Future Actions:

  • Rep. Myrick is unsure if this legislation will have a chance of getting passed in an election year.  However, she believes that this legislation will help generate a discussion and point out the countries that speak of religious freedoms, yet blatantly reject people from coming to their country based on a religious belief.

Action items:
 
  • Citizens wishing to get involved in this issue should contact their Member of Congress and urge them to sign up as a cosponsor to Rep. Myrick’s legislation (H.R.6590), as well as Rep. Weiner’s legislation (H.R.2981). 
*Your Member can be found here.
 
Other “Wake Up America” Items to Note
 
Arab Linguist Program at the Federal Bureau of Investigation
 
On June 12, 2008, Rep. Myrick sent a letter to the Assistant Director of Congressional Affairs, Richard Powers, asking him specific questions about the Arab Linguist Program at the Federal Bureau of Investigation.  The FBI told us on July 21, 2008, that they had received the letter and are currently working to respond to the questions.  She is unsure when she will get an official response.
 
Sovereign Wealth Fund investments
 
Over the past several months, Rep. Myrick’s office has been doing extensive research into Sovereign Wealth Funds (SWF).  Based on the nature and scope of how SWFs have developed and are used, we feel that a GAO study should not be requested as of yet.  It is extremely hard to calculate where the funds have been placed due to transparency issues.  Currently, Rep. Myrick is trying to schedule meetings at the Treasury and with experts on this issue.  To get to the root of the issue with SWFs, Rep. Myrick is considering drafting legislation that would create basic rules of transparency for SWF investments in the US.  These basic requirements would be as simple as releasing their size, origin and history, returns achieved, target investments, and investment strategies.  They should also make this information available on a public website.  This would provide a foundation to protect individual investors, address some national security concerns, and help us track what and where countries are investing in our businesses and economic sectors.  This legislation would be based largely on the best practices of SWFs that are very transparent, such as Norway’s Government Pension Fund, and suggestions by experts.              
 
Rep. Myrick, along with Reps. Bud Cramer (D-AL), Kay Granger (R-TX) and Ben Chandler (D-KY) is a co-chair of the 120-member, bipartisan House Anti-Terrorism/Jihad Caucus, a group that “serves to educate Members of Congress, their staff and the general public about the threats to our country that are fueled by extremist ideologies. The Caucus recognizes that terrorism is not a Democrat or Republican problem; it is a critical issue for all Americans. To this end, the Caucus will facilitate an educational process and healthy exchange of ideas in a bipartisan setting.”
 
Editor’s note: The “Wake Up America” agenda is Rep. Myrick’s own agenda, not an agenda of the House Anti-Terrorism/Jihad Caucus.
 
Brought to you by the editors and research staff of FamilySecurityMatters.org.

Reader Comments: Submit Your Comment (0) | Sign Up for FSM Updates!

Print This
  Comments (0)